Ray-Ban Meta Glasses Are Everywhere Now: Here’s the Privacy Trade-Off

The other day I ran into a neighbor while I was walking my dog. Bacchi, my rescue poodle, looked adorable with his shiny new summer haircut, but me? Not so much. I looked every bit as hot, sweaty, and bedraggled as I felt in the 100-degree New York City heat. I didn’t realize I was being filmed until I noticed a tiny light pulsing on his sunglasses. And to tell you the truth, I didn’t like it.

It’s hard to believe there was once a time when looking lousy or embarrassing ourselves in public was shared with only a few trusted souls. Now, we run the risk of being filmed everywhere we go. Usually, an obvious, hand-held phone lets us know we’re on camera, but smart glasses, like Ray-Ban Meta, have altered the privacy landscape and further eroded the social contract between friends and strangers alike.

Smart glasses are hardly ubiquitous, but that’s likely to change. Meta currently owns the global landscape, with a 73% market share. Meta’s collaboration with EssilorLuxottica, Ray-Ban’s parent company, started in 2019. To date, this mega-partnership has resulted in two generations of Ray-Ban smart glasses. EssilorLuxottica also owns smart glasses manufacturer Oakley, an up-and-coming consumer contender. The company also owns a host of other eyewear brands, including Vogue Eyewear and Foster Grant.

Where Meta goes, others follow. Google has already announced an AI-powered smart glasses partnership with Warby Parker, set to launch later this year. Rumor has it that Apple and Samsung won’t be far behind. And it’s not just the big names. Current smart glasses manufacturers include Xiaomi and TCL RayNeo.

Read more: State of Consumer Data 2026: Americans Want More Control Over What Their Devices Collect

For the average user, smart glasses are highly convenient and fun to wear. You can send and receive text messages without touching a screen and even stream audio and livestream content directly to platforms like Instagram and Facebook. Smart glasses provide many of the same utilities smartphones do, albeit hands-free. It’s kind of hysterical that we now think of holding a phone in our hands as a hassle. 

Greg Swan, whose team introduced Snapchat Spectacles to pro sports and who's now head of futures and client transformation at FINN Partners, is on his third pair of smart glasses. Currently, he’s sporting Meta Ray-Ban Display, which costs $799 a pop. “It’s a tricky time for consumer adoption of smart glasses, as we work to figure out the mix of tech, privacy, and utility,” he says.

Swan feels that smart glasses adoption is moving forward because the tech now looks like real glasses, coupled with an entry price point that is manageable for more consumers. He also thinks AI is making smart glasses more useful than ever before, with capabilities that include live translation, hands-free capture of photos and video, and queries that provide on-the-spot answers about visuals in your environment.

Smart glasses have come down in price since they were first introduced. Consumers can nab a cheapy pair for around $250, although the highest-quality options that include bells and whistles like augmented reality displays will run you an easy $1,000 or more. If you need prescription lenses, that will, of course, raise your cost.

That initial cost may not be a one-and-done. Meta now charges a monthly subscription for certain smart glasses features, like audio-boosting, Conversation Focus, and Premium Device Support.

For many consumers, the ability to take pictures hands-free is worth the price of admission. As we’ve seen with a multitude of products, from detergent pods to robotic mops, convenience is king. Smart glasses eliminate the need to have your phone at the ready at all times. This can be particularly compelling during vacations or special events that beg for unending visual mementos. Of course, worshipping at the shrine of visual convenience raises obvious privacy concerns.

The Reviews.org State of Consumer Data 2026 report found that 30% of people are more concerned about the ability of connected devices to collect and use data than they were a year ago. Creepy, smart-glasses-wearing pickup artists and unethical influencers may be driving this anxiety, at least in part.

Multiple news outlets have reported that Meta’s so-called “perv glasses” are being used to record unsuspecting women who don’t know they’re being filmed until they come across the footage online. The videos shot without their knowledge or consent often include identifying information like names and phone numbers. How long will it be before smart glasses are being used to film children in playgrounds and theme parks, if they’re not being used that way already? It’s a scary thought.  

Swan puts it plainly: “The unresolved piece is consent from the people around you. The wearer opted in. The person across the coffee shop didn't.” He calls it a “norms problem,” one where educated users are wary of who holds their data, but most people don't think hard about the trade they're making as long as the tech is useful.

According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation, footage taken on smart glasses is routinely and systematically used for training AI systems by human contractors. Even if the smart glasses user doesn’t manually upload their footage online, it’s likely being stored in the Meta AI mobile app. This makes it accessible to automated and manual (human) review. Workers have reported seeing everything from intimate activity to bathroom use. The footage and audio you record may also be accessed by Meta’s third-party contractors and servers, like Google. 

Like the internet itself, smart glasses have both wonderful and terrible applications. And it's no secret that ethics haven’t kept up with technology, including AI.

We’ve all gotten used to being filmed everywhere and anywhere. Some people may feel that being filmed by people in smart glasses is no big deal. Others, including many parents, may be concerned.

Unlike cameras and phones, smart glasses aren’t designed to look like devices that film you. This makes their usage in vulnerable settings, as well as in public places, worrisome.

So what comes next? Smart glasses aren’t going away any time soon. They’re simply too profitable. It's estimated that Reality Labs, Meta's division that includes smart glasses, brought in $2.21 billion in 2025 — though Meta doesn't disclose how much of that came from glasses specifically versus its other hardware.

We can hope ethics will catch up to human behavior, but do we really think that will happen? The best we can do is educate ourselves and our kids to be our best selves in public (no pressure there). And as always, to be on the lookout for creeps who live to take advantage.

Found this useful? Follow Reviews.org on Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, or catch us on YouTube. 

You can also add us as a preferred Google search source for the latest in tech and home services.