37% of Americans Are Using a TV Antenna Again. Most Still Can’t Get All Their Local Channels.

Donut chart showing 59% of Americans can't get all local channels via TV antenna — 44% receive most, 13% get none.

Most Americans using a TV antenna still can't receive every local channel in their area.

// Antennas are back, but coverage gaps remain
John Schmoll
Jun 22, 2026
Icon Time To Read2 min read
Icon CheckEdited ByKelly Huh

Watching your local channels for weather updates or to catch your hometown team's action is something many people want. In reality, that often requires yet another streaming subscription. In a recent survey from Reviews.org, we found that instead of staying loyal, Americans are canceling, downgrading to an ad-supported tier, and turning to free streaming options to keep costs in check. Over-the-air antenna usage points to a nearly identical mindset — striving for flexibility to rein in spending.

Antennas are back, but local-channel access is uneven

An over-the-air antenna is a good way to get local channels without cable. 37% of Americans use an antenna to watch local networks. Of those polled, only 41% say they get all of their locally available channels.

Free local channels are appealing in theory, but it can be a mirage for most, due to factors like signal strength, geography, nearby buildings blocking reception, or setup issues. In our survey, we found that for those using antennas:

  • 41% say they get all locally available channels
  • 44% receive most, but not every local channel
  • 13% only get a small handful of local channels
  • 2% get nothing

Often pitched as a tool to help frustrated Americans save money on streaming, antennas aren’t always a perfect solution. My family uses an antenna, and our experience has been good overall. We get all of our local channels, which helps us reduce reliance on paid services. Sadly, that isn’t the case for all Americans.

Free TV is becoming a pressure valve for subscription overload

Streaming began with the promise of watching your favorite content, without contracts, for less. That was initially true, but the maturation of streaming reveals something different. Favorite shows are spread across numerous platforms, live sports are challenging to watch, and price hikes occur too often. The cost of streaming adds up.

Americans use free streaming services to make watching TV cheaper. 58% of people polled regularly watch ad-supported YouTube as a replacement for paid streaming. 55% use FAST platforms (free, ad-supported streaming television) to cut costs. The top FAST platforms Americans use to save money include Tubi (43%), The Roku Channel (32%), and Pluto TV (30%).

Price hikes are making viewers treat TV like something they can rotate

Streaming price hikes have become routine — most paid platforms raise rates annually, and some do so twice a year. Our study shows that 52% of Americans have canceled or downgraded a service in reaction. Over half (55%) have re-subscribed to a platform they previously canceled.

Americans are using the freedom streaming offers to rotate subscriptions to benefit their monthly budgets. Nearly half (48%) subscribe to a platform for one show or event, only to promptly cancel it once complete. Similarly, 43% say they plan to cancel at least one subscription in the next three months. For those staying with a service, 38% moved from an ad-free tier to an ad-supported one over the past year, to save money.

Viewers want TV to feel simpler, not necessarily like cable again

Streaming was supposed to make TV simple, but the numbers reveal something different. Not surprisingly, 68% of people polled would consolidate all their streaming subscriptions into a single monthly bill if they could. Nearly half (46%) bundle their streaming services together. It’s understandable, too. The average American has three streaming subscriptions, and 21% pay for five or more. It’s clear that Americans want TV to be less complicated. We don’t want less TV; we just want fewer hurdles in getting content.

How to simplify streaming and cut costs

If you’re able, using an antenna is just the first step in simplifying your content needs. Pairing an antenna with FAST apps, rotating paid subscriptions, and bundling all help reduce what you’re spending on TV and make what you do watch easier to manage.

John Schmoll
Written by
John Schmoll is an experienced writer and reviewer with 15+ years of experience covering streaming TV services and cell phone plans, helping readers compare features, pricing, and fine print to find the best fit. A former stockbroker with an MBA in Finance, he also provides practical guidance around saving, debt payoff, investing basics, and smarter everyday money decisions. His work has appeared in GoBankingRates, Investopedia, Prudential, and U.S. News, and he writes for banks and business clients. He lives in Omaha with his wife and three children.

Related Articles

Donut chart showing 59% of Americans can't get all local channels via TV antenna — 44% receive most, 13% get none.
37% of Americans Are Using a TV Antenna Again. Most Still Can’t Get All Their Local Channels.
Reviews.org data shows 37% of Americans use TV antennas, but most antenna users still miss...
Couple watching soccer at home on the couch, smiling and holding beers and a soccer ball.
How to See the 2026 FIFA World Cup On the Cheap
Tickets to FIFA World Cup 2026 are cost-prohibitive for many fans. Watching from home via...
Person holding a smartphone while pressing a button on a smart home control panel mounted on a wall.
45% of Americans Have Never Touched Their Smart Device Privacy Settings — Fix It in 3 Steps
Nearly half of Americans have never changed smart device privacy settings. Here are simple places...
Woman sitting on couch with a concerned expression pointing a remote at a smart TV
Your Smart TV Tracks More Than You Think—and Most Americans Don’t Know How to Stop It
Smart TVs are in most U.S. homes, but many Americans don't feel in control of...